Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 765 F.3d 855 - Doe v. Hagar

Doe v. Hagar’s Empirical Analysis

765 F.3d 855 · 2014

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. · W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. Giancontieri · United States v. Simmons · Vinson v. Linn-Mar Community School District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he plaintiff need not be named if the alleged libel contains matters of description or other references therein, or the extraneous facts and circumstances show that plaintiff was intended to be the object of the alleged libel, and was so understood by others.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A dispute is genuine if the evidence is such that it could cause a reasonable jury to return a verdict for either party; a fact is material if its resolution affects the outcome of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and giv[e] that party the benefit of all reasonable inferences that can be drawn from the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.