Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 765 F. Supp. 69 - Duke v. Touche Ross & Co.

765 F. Supp. 69 - Duke v. Touche Ross & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
August 2012
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2012

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

160199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1404

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Sedima Sprl v. Imrex Company Inc · Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Ultramares [Corp. v. Touche, Niven & Co., 255 N.Y. 170 , 174 N.E. 441 (1931)], the court was concerned with exposing accountants to liability to an “indeterminate class of persons who, presently or in the future, might ... rel[y] on a negligently inaccurate audit.” 255 N.Y. 170 , 174 N.E. 441, 446 . In the instant case, on the other hand, the report at issue was not disseminated to the public at large. Rather, it was distributed to a select group of qualified investors. In addition, plaintiffs allege that defendant solicited some of them to invest in the Limited Partnerships. (Complaint ¶ 20.) Plaintiffs have met the pleading requirements for a claim of negligent misrepresentation. Defendant’s motion to dismiss this claim is denied.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.