Jackson v. Conway’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[Bjefore bringing in an expert, the [State] must give notice to the defendant ... which they failed to do.... Accordingly, I am directing you to disregard the testimony of Dr. Lenane on the grounds that she was called as an expert and no notice was given.... Any statements of fact or any conclusions that she would render to you I direct that you disregard in their entirety.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Jackson v. Conway

2. “‘the increment of incorrectness beyond error need not be great; otherwise, habeas relief would be limited to state court decisions so far off the mark as to suggest judicial incompetence.’ ” Cornell v. Kirkpatrick, 665 F.3d 369 , 375 (2d Cir.2011) (quoting Georgison v. Donelli, 588 F.3d 145 , 154 (2d Cir.2009)). 20 . A necessary corollary to this point is that”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Jackson v. Conway

3. “was not required to advise defendant of his Miranda rights before speaking with him.” Id. (citation omitted). 18 . Section 2254(d)(2), which permits federal relief if the state court decision”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Jackson v. Conway