Lee v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Liberty Mortgage Co. v. Frey · Horne v. Flores · Nemaizer v. Baker · Advanced Magnetics, Inc. v. Bayfront Partners, Inc. · The Amalgamated Sugar Company, Llc v. Nl Industries, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The standard to prove 'fraud on the court' is extremely high, and relief under Rule 60(d) is 'narrower in scope than that which is sufficient for relief by timely motion under [Rule] 60(b)(3).'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“reviewed for inequitable application because of changed circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re McKeever
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.