Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 765 NE2D 192 - Wallace v. Rosen

Wallace v. Rosen’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 177 Ind. App. 403 - Kroger Co. v. Haun · Winegeart v. State · Dukett v. Mausness · Beckett v. Clinton Prairie School Corp. · Mercer v. Corbin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “implies the conscious doing of a wrong because of dishonest purpose or moral obliquity.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “and presupposes a duty and breach thereof, but serves as an affirmative defense to prevent recovery by the plaintiff. By contrast, incurred risk demands a subjective analysis with inquiry into the particular actor's knowledge, is concerned with the voluntariness of a risk, and is blind as to reasonableness of risk acceptance. Incurred risk also involves a mental state of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is present when a party flagrantly disregards the form and content requirements of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, omits and misstates relevant facts appearing in the record, and files briefs appearing to have been written in a manner calculated to require the maximum expenditure of time both by the opposing party and the reviewing court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.