Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 765 NE2D 591 - Sanders v. State

Sanders v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

55 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Canaan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In post-conviction proceedings, complaints that something went awry at trial are generally cognizable only when they show deprivation of the right to effective counsel or issues demonstrably unavailable at the time of trial or direct appeal.”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]t is wrong to review [a] fundamental error claim in a post-conviction proceeding.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.