State v. Geer’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
1 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2018
1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bordenkircher v. Hayes · Castaneda v. Partida · Wayte v. United States · Colorado v. Bertine · Illinois v. Lafayette
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the defendant must demonstrate that a prosecutorial policy result[ed] in a discriminatory effect, based on an unlawful classification.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'only those bigamists who practice bigamy for other than religious reasons.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Green · State v. Holm“as long as the prosecutor has probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed, the decision regarding whether to prosecute ... rests entirely in the prosecutor's discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Karren
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.