People v. Winters’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2015
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. District Court, Second Judicial District · Wilson v. People · People v. Guenther · People v. Taggart · Engelbrecht v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Any person convicted pursuant to paragraph (a) of subsection (2) of this section ... shall be sentenced to the department of corrections for at least the minimum term of incarceration in the presumptive range provided for such offense....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shipley v. People“Any person who is subject to the provisions of this subsection (8) shall not be eligible for probation or suspension of sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shipley v. People“an unequivocal legislative intent that violators be sentenced to the custody of the Department of Corrections,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shipley v. People
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.