Culie v. Arnett’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[in a garnishment proceeding the judgment creditor stands in the shoes of the judgment debtor to enforce a liability owed to the latter by a third party-the garnishee.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Ultra Thin, Inc. v. Lane · Tulsa Junior College v. Urban Design Group, Inc.

2. “... Culie sought to impose on the insurer the employer’s alleged liability based on respondeat superior without having first obtained a judgment against the employer. Neither the recitation of the judgment that Arnett was in the employer’s service when harm occurred nor Culie’s mere showing in the garnishment proceeding that Arnett was employed by the insured and was driving his employer’s vehicle when the collision occurred establishes the employer’s respondeat superior liability_”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Cox v. Kansas City Life Insurance Co.

3. “(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a petition filed under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title ... operates as a stay, applicable to all entities, of— (1) the commencement or continuation ... of a judicial ... action or proceeding against the debtor that was or could have been commenced before the commencement of the case under this title, or to recover a claim against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the case under this title....”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Taff v. Baker