Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 765 SO2D 1281 - Browder v. Williams

Browder v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 418 So. 2d 764 - McKee v. McKee · 708 So. 2d 44 - Par Industries, Inc. v. Target Container Co. · 741 So. 2d 259 - Mauck v. Columbus Hotel Co. · 524 So. 2d 947 - Johnson v. Hinds County · 761 So. 2d 157 - Pearson v. Pearson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly; (2) the likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer; (3) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar services; (4) the amount involved and the results obtained; (5) the time limitations imposed by the client or by the circumstances; (6) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client; (7) the experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing the services; and (8) whether the fee is fixed or contingent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he reasonableness of an attorney's fee award is determined by reference to the factors set forth in Rule 1.5 of the Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he trial judge should reconsider this issue in light of the McKee factors and support a new award ... based on findings of fact and conclusions of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.