Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

765 So. 2d 153

Mills v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-06-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2005

1 state decisions

Relies on 462 So. 2d 115 - Bogan v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-06-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Katharthur Mills appeals his convictions and sentences for burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. We affirm the judgments and sentences but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error. The trial court announced that it was sentencing Mr. Mills as a violent career criminal. The sentencing documents, however, indicate that Mr. Mills was sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender. This should be corrected on remand to reflect that Mr. Mills was sentenced as a violent career criminal. See Bogan v. State, 462 So.2d 115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (holding that written sentence must conform to oral pronouncement).

¶2Affirmed; remanded for correction of scrivener’s error.

PARKER, A.C.J., and BLUE and GREEN, JJ., Concur.
/765/so2d/153 · .json · Public domain