765 So. 2d 255 - Woods v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 559 So. 2d 187 - State v. Law · Brown v. State · 511 So. 2d 397 - Murphy v. State · 730 So. 2d 757 - Isaac v. State · S.B. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evidence that the defendant had actual knowledge of the presence of the contraband or evidence of incriminating statements or circumstances, other than simple proximity to the contraband, from which the jury could infer the defendant's knowledge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Where the only proof of guilt is circumstantial, no matter how strongly the evidence may suggest guilt, a conviction cannot be sustained unless the evidence is inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“kick and the circumstances surrounding it are not sufficient to establish knowledge of the cocaine's presence and are consistent with Woods' reasonable hypothesis of innocence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.