Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

765 So. 2d 305

Merrill v. Partridge

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 31, 2000

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-08-31

Relies on 634 So. 2d 769 - Dura-Stress, Inc. v. Law · 707 So. 2d 906 - Carter v. Howey

Decided 2000-08-31

PER CURIAM.

¶1We find no error in the denial of the initial motion to recuse. As to the amended motion to recuse, it appears from the documents filed in this court that it was untimely filed. See• Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.160(e); Carter v. Howey, 707 So.2d 906 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Dura-Stress, Inc. v. Law, 634 So.2d 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). The petitioner has not demonstrated any good cause for an exception to the ten-day time requirement.

¶2PETITION DENIED.

COBB, HARRIS, and GRIFFIN, JJ„ concur.
/765/so2d/305 · .json · Public domain