765 So. 2d 35 - Parks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State · 405 So. 2d 418 - Jollie v. State · 642 So. 2d 742 - Carder v. State · 708 So. 2d 617 - Maddox v. State · Dorfman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[G]eneral sentences have been prohibited in Florida since Dorfman v. State , 351 So.2d 954 (Fla. 1977).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Champagne v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.