765 So. 2d 395 - State ex rel. A.R.’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 620 (§ 420 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 670 (§ 470 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on 753 So. 2d 861 - Wallace C. Drennan, Inc. v. SEWERAGE & WATER · 706 So. 2d 688 - State, in Interest of Latoya W. · State in Interest of Martorana · 681 So. 2d 22 - State in re the Adoption of "Deborah"
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The peremptory exception of no right of action questions whether plaintiff has an interest in judicially enforcing the right alleged against the defendant. In considering the exception, the court must decide whether the plaintiff belongs to a particular class for which the law grants a remedy for a particular grievance or whether the plaintiff has an interest in judicially enforcing the right asserted. It raises neither the question of plaintiffs ability to prevail on the merits nor whether defendant |4may have a valid defense. Wallace C. Dren-nan, Inc. v. Sewerage & Water Bd. Of New Orleans, 98-2423 (La.App. 4 Cir. 9/22/99) , 753 So.2d 861 . The purpose of the peremptory exception of no cause of action, on the other hand, is to determine the sufficiency in law of the petition. It questions whether, accepting all well-pleaded allegations of fact, the petition sufficiently alleges grievances for which the law affords a remedy. Id.; La. C.C.P. art. 931. The judgment on this exception is reviewed de novo, because the exception raises a legal question. This Court is to determine whether in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, and with every doubt resolved in their behalf, the petition states any valid cause of action for relief. Id.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The specifics of the subsidy contract, therefore, are not subject to review by the court absent a showing of deviation from the standard set forth in the enabling legislation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.