State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
52
cited by 52 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited
52 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · State v. Jacobs · 544 So. 2d 1268 - State v. Cashen · State v. Morgan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The fact finder’s discretion will be impinged upon only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law. [State v.] Mussall, 523 So.2d 1305 [ (La.1988)]; [State v.] Green, 588 So.2d 757 [ (La.App. 4 Cir.1991) ]. “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” State v. Smith, 600 So.2d 1319, 1324 (La.1992). A factfinder’s credibility decision should not be disturbed unless it is clearly contrary to the evidence. State v. Huckabay, 2000-1082 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/6/02) , 809 So.2d 1093 [, writ denied, 02-703 (La.11/1/02), 828 So.2d 564 ]; State v. Harris, 99-3147 (La.App. 4 Cir. 5/31/00) , 765 So.2d 432 [, writ denied, 00-1946 (La.9/21/01), 797 So.2d 60 ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.