Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 765 SO2D 516 - Manning v. State

Manning v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

51 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Powers v. Ohio · Clemons v. Mississippi · United States v. Eichman · McCarty Ranch Trust v. Craig

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) disparate treatment, that is, the presence of unchallenged jurors of the opposite race who share the characteristic given as the basis for the challenge; (2) the failure to voir dire as to the characteristic cited; ... (3) the characteristic cited is unrelated to the facts of the case; (4) lack of record support for the stated reason; and (5) group-based traits.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]lthough lack of record support is one indication of pretext . . . the basis for the prosecutor's strike need not be in the record.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Such deference is necessary because finding that a striking party engaged in discrimination is largely a factual finding and thus should be accorded appropriate deference on appeal. . . . Indeed, we will not overrule a trial court on a Batson ruling unless the record indicates that the ruling was clearly erroneous or against the overwhelming weight of the evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.