Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

765 So. 2d 56

Docket No. 99-3907.

Vaughan v. State

Francis VAUGHAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 12, 2000.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-01-12

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 2004

3 state decisions

Relies on 683 So. 2d 475 - In Re Amendment to Fla. Rules of Crim. · Raley v. State · 678 So. 2d 1285 - In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Judicial Administration Regarding Death Cases

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-01-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Francis Vaughan, Boca Raton, pro se.

¶2No appearance required for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Appellant has appealed a denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The issue he has raised is identical to one he raised in a prior rule 3.800(a) motion which was denied on the merits and affirmed without opinion by this court.

¶5The law of the case doctrine applies when the defendant seeks to litigate a specific issue decided on the merits in an earlier post conviction proceeding regarding the legality of the sentence. Raley v. State, 675 So.2d 170 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), cause dismissed, 678 So.2d 1287 (Fla. 1996), appeal dismissed, 683 So.2d 484 (Fla.1996). Appellant is thus barred from raising the issue he has raised here, which is whether the trial court erred in not giving him credit for time served on probation and community control. We therefore affirm.

¶6WARNER, C.J., KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

/765/so2d/56 · .json · Public domain