765 So. 2d 784 - Klayman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Witt v. State · State v. Callaway · 750 So. 2d 1 - Hayes v. State · 660 So. 2d 1371 - State v. Iacovone · 684 So. 2d 831 - State v. Baxley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“David Klayman appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. He contends that the court erred in failing to apply the supreme court's recent decision of Hayes v. State, 750 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1999), to his conviction of trafficking in hydrocodone.... In Hayes , the supreme court quashed this court's decision in the underlying case of State v. Hayes, 720 So.2d 1095 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), quashed, 750 So.2d 1 (Fla.1999), and held that the drug trafficking statute (section 893.135(1)(c)1, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1996)) did not apply to possession of hydrocodone in amounts under fifteen milligrams per dosage unit. Appellant argues that the supreme court's decision in Hayes should be given retroactive application because the effect of the decision has constitutional ramifications for those persons whose sentence was rendered or upheld pursuant to State v. Baxley, 684 So.2d 831, 832-33 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), and our decision in State v. Hayes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“for an evidentiary hearing to determine the validity of [Klayman's] sentence pursuant to Hayes v. State , and for resentencing if appropriate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Should the supreme court's decision in Hayes v. State, [ 750 So.2d 1 (Fla.1999)] be retroactively applied?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.