Asbury v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chastine v. Broome · J. F. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the judge enters into the proceedings and becomes a participant, a shadow is cast upon judicial neutrality so that disqualification is required.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[o]bviously, the trial judge serves as the neutral arbiter in the proceedings and must not enter the fray by giving `tips' to either side.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“an active participant by prompting the State to present evidence and by sua sponte recalling witnesses and then asking them questions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.