K.E.A. v. T.A.A.’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Simms v. Thompson · Speck v. Union Electric Co. · Vinson v. Vinson · L_ C. F v. D_ H. F · Hemphill Ex Rel. Burns v. Hemphill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well established ‘that a finding or implication of paternity in a divorce or annulment decree, or in an incidental support or custody order, is res judicata on the issue of paternity in subsequent proceedings between the former spouses and that each of them is bound by the prior paternity determination.’ ’’ K.E.A. v. T.A.A., 765 S.W.2d 389, 391 (Mo.App.1989) (quoting In re Marriage of Campbell, 741 S.W.2d 294, 296 (Mo.App.1987)). .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. C.S. v. L.K.M.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.