Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

766 A.2d 500

In re Gross

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 2000-06-15

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 2015

4 state decisions

Relies on In Re Goldsborough

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-06-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1Michael R. Gross is a member of the Bar of the District of Columbia, having been admitted by motion on October 9, 1980. On January 5, 1998, Gross was disbarred by consent by the Court of Appeals of Maryland. On October 8, 1999, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommended that Gross be disbarred in the District of Columbia as reciprocal discipline.

¶2Gross did not participate in the proceedings before the Board, nor has he noted an exception to the Board’s recommendation. The Office of Bar Counsel has advised us that Bar Counsel likewise does not except to that recommendation. Under these circumstances, we adopt the Board’s recommendation, see In re Goldsborough, 654 A.2d 1285, 1287 (D.C.1995), and Michael R. Gross is hereby disbarred.

¶3So ordered.1

¶4. We direct Gross' attention to the requirements of D.C.App.R. XI, § 14.

/766/a2d/500 · .json · Public domain