Cerro Copper Products Co. v. Ruckelshaus’s Empirical Analysis
766 F.2d 1060 · 1985
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2002
13 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 33 U.S.C. § 1251 (Alternative Water Sources Act of 2000) · 33 U.S.C. § 1311 · 33 U.S.C. § 1317 · 33 U.S.C. § 1369 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · Morton v. Ruiz · Chemical Manufacturers Association v. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“prevent sludge use or disposal by such works in accordance with section 405 of this Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“grounds which arose after [the] ninetieth day”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.