Golden v. Faust’s Empirical Analysis
766 F.2d 1339 · 1985
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently June 2011
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. First National Bank · Lojek v. Thomas · 234 Cal. App. 2d 753 - Kunstman v. Mirizzi · 160 Cal. App. 3d 107 - Muraoka v. Budget Rent-A-Car, Inc. · United States v. C. McInnes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the party to be estopped must be apprised of the facts; (2) the other party must be ignorant of the true state of facts, and the party to be estopped must have acted so that the other party had a right to believe that the party intended its conduct to be acted upon; and (3) the other party must have relied on the conduct to its prejudice.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Delta Energy Projects Nos. V-A & V-B, California Limited Partnerships Altawind Inc., a California Corporation Craig M. Hunt v. Sedgwick James of California, Corporation Incorporated Under the Laws of Both the State of California and the State of Illinois Fred S. James of Illinois, Delta Energy Projects Nos. Iii, IV and Vi: Roan Corporation Requip, Inc. Patrick J. Hodges v. Sedgwick James of California, Fred S. James of Illinois, Corportations Incorporated Under the Laws of Both the State of California and the State of Illinois · Holland v. Norwegian Cruise Lines
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.