Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 766 F.2d 265 - Glick v. Koenig

Glick v. Koenig’s Empirical Analysis

766 F.2d 265 · 1985

Citation profile

103
cited by 103 later decisions
3
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 7 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Myers v. Morris (1987), Perkins v. Silverstein (1991)

30 federal appellate · 7 district · 4 state decisions

5101985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Stump v. Sparkman · Davis v. Scherer · Briscoe v. W · Bittner v. Sadoff & Rudoy Industries

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether appellant has made a showing of likelihood of success on appeal, (2) whether appellant has demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable injury absent a stay, (3) whether the stay would substantially harm other parties to the litigation, and (4) where the public interest lies.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Otherwise a party may amend the party's pleading only by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party; and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'The denial of a motion to amend the pleadings pursuant to Rule 15(a) will be overturned only if the trial court abused its discretion.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.