National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. One Square Foot More or Less Parcel of Land in the City of New London County of New London State of Connecticut’s Empirical Analysis
766 F.2d 685 · 1985
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Pescatore v. Pan American World Airways, Inc. (1996), United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit (1992)
24 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Miller · Jizmejian v. United States · Bauman v. Ross · United States v. Reynolds · Almota Farmers Elevator and Warehouse Company v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e will reverse the judgment of a trial court ... because of an error in the jury instructions only if, based on a review of the record as a whole, we are persuaded that the error was prejudicial.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether the entire charge, viewed in light of all of the evidence, would tend to confuse or mislead the jury as to the principles of law that apply to the facts.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“See Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. One 25,900 Square Foot More or Less Parcel of Land in the City of New London , 766 F.2d 685 , 688 (2d Cir. 1985) (citations omitted) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.