Browning v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis
766 F.3d 702 · 2014
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Donato v. Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services of United States · Jenkins v. Bowen · O'Connor-Spinner v. Astrue · Pate-Fires v. Astrue · Harmon v. Apfel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“many of the jobs have changed and some have disappeared.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“unacceptably crude method of dividing the number of jobs in some large category ... by the number of job classifications in the category, even though there is no basis for assuming that there are, for example, as many mophead trimmer- and-wrappers, DOT 789.687-106, as there are fish-egg packers, DOT 529.687-086, or poultry-dressing workers, DOT 525.687-082 — all being hand-packager jobs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is apparent from the description that many of the jobs are beyond the plaintiff's capacity to do.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.