Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 766 FSUPP 1112 - Baker v. Alderman

Baker v. Alderman’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2011

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

20199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Sweat v. Miller Brewing Co. · Wood v. Orange County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The resign-to-run requirement in section 99.012(7) of the Florida Statutes is enforced by section 99.021[,] which provides that “[ejach candidate ... for nomination or election to any office other than a judicial office as defined in chapter 105, shall take and subscribe to an oath or affirmation in writing.” Plaintiff swore, under the Oath of Candidate, “that he has resigned from any office from which he is required to resign pursuant to Section 99.012, Florida Statutes.” Hence, when Plaintiff signed the Oath of Candidate, he made a sworn affirmation of resignation. This Court finds that Plaintiff resigned hy operation of law, pursuant to section 99.012(7) of the Florida Statutes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “for a public office which is currently held by an individual who has the authority to appoint, employ, promote or otherwise supervise that subordinate personnel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “had resigned from any office from which he [was] required to resign pursuant to Section 99.012 Florida Statutes”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.