Moore v. DeBiase’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

cited by 42 later decisions

January 2007

most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 13 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill · Hagans v. Lavine · American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn · Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“"Whenever a separate and independent claim or cause of action within the jurisdiction conferred by section 1331 of this title is joined with one or more otherwise non-removable claims or causes of action, the entire case may be removed and the district court may determine all issues therein, or, in its discretion, may remand all matters in which state law predominates.””
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 861 F. Supp. 1036 - Burnett v. Birmingham Board of Education · 897 F. Supp. 284 - Spaulding v. Mingo County Board of Education
“The notice of removal of a civil action or proceeding shall be filed within thirty days after receipt by the defendant, through service or otherwise, of a copy of the initial pleading setting forth the claim upon which such action or proceeding is based....”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Wissel & Sons Construction Co. · Eyal Lior v. Sit
“Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of Congress, any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court ... embracing the place where such action is pending.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Eyal Lior v. Sit · 867 F. Supp. 1309 - Padilla v. City of Saginaw

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.