Medics, Inc. v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1395C (§ 1811 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395H (§ 1816 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395M (§ 1834 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395U (§ 1842 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395X (§ 1861 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)
Relies on Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family Physicians · Cervoni v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Bailey v. Sullivan · Linoz v. Heckler · St. Mary's Hospital of Troy v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Ass'n/Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Greater New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No rule, requirement or other statement of policy (other than a national [benefits] coverage determination) that establishes or changes a substantive legal standard governing the scope of benefits, the payment for services, or the eligibility of individuals, entities or organizations to furnish or receive services or benefits under [the Medicare Act] shall take effect unless it is promulgated by the Secretary by regulation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“General notice of proposed rule making shall be published in the Federal Register, unless persons subject thereto are named and either personally served or otherwise have actual notice thereof in accordance with law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Section 1395hh] does not impose on the Secretary any duty which he did not already have under the [APA], in the sense that both require full rule-making only for substantive rules or policy changes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Warder v. Shalala
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.