Jersild v. Aker’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · 136 Wis. 2d 304 - Green Spring Farms v. Kersten · 94 Wis. 2d 17 - Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc. · 124 Wis. 2d 175 - Lundin v. Shimanski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. A false representation; 2. Made with the intent to defraud and for the purpose of inducing another to act upon it; and 3. Actually inducing another to rely and act upon the representation causing injury or damage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.