Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 766 N.E.2d 784 - Watson v. Sears

Watson v. Sears’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Paternity of Tompkins · Shelby Engineering Co., Inc. v. Action Steel Supply, Inc. · Pufahl v. National Bank · 82 F. Supp. 2d 448 - Powers v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Simply put, if the appropriate person does not make the order to transfer assets, then the order is ineffective.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 965 So. 2d 1076 - Davis v. Sterne, Agee and Leach, Inc.
  2. “(1) it is made by the appropriate person;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 965 So. 2d 1076 - Davis v. Sterne, Agee and Leach, Inc.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.