Koenig v. Koenig’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
4
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rowland v. Christian · Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique · Funk v. United States · Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority · Mounsey v. Ellard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the foreseeability or possibility of harm; (2) the purpose for which the entrant entered the premises; (3) the time, manner, and circumstances under which the entrant entered the premises; (4) the use to which the premises are put or are expected to be put; (5) the reasonableness of the inspection, repair, or warning; (6) the opportunity and ease of repair or correction or giving of the warning; and (7) the burden on the land occupier and/or community in terms of inconvenience or cost in providing adequate protection.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“); Nelson v. Freeland, 349 N.C. 615 , 507 S.E.2d 882 , 889 (1998) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the fungible and unpredictable nature of the classifications makes it impossible for landowners to conform their behavior to current community standards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Smith v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.