Redland v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 2012
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Scheikofsky v. State · State v. Cantrell · Jones v. State · Morad v. Wyoming Highway Department · State v. Vliet
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“INSTRUCTION NO. 3 The four counts each charge a separate crime, all alleged to have occurred in the course of events described by the evidence. Each of the counts must be separately considered by you. The state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt each of the essential elements of each of the counts. The essential elements are: For each of the counts, the first three (8) elements are: 1. On or about the 10th day of July, 2000, 2. In Laramie County, Wyoming 3. The defendant, Velma Reilly, [3] The other elements of the four (4) counts are: AS TO COUNT I, Conspiracy to Commit a Crime: 4. Agreed with one or more persons 5. That they or one or more of them would commit the crime of Robbery and 6. One or more of them did an overt act to effect the objective of the agreement. AS TO COUNT II, Kidnapping: 4. Unlawfully removed and confined [the victim] 5. With the intent to facilitate the commission of a robbery, and 6. [The victim] was not released substantially unharmed and in a safe place prior to trial. AS TO COUNT III, Aggravated Robbery: 4. Did steal, take or drive away the property of [the victim] with the intent to deprive her of that property, and 5. In the course of committing this crime used or exhibited a deadly weapon. AS TO COUNT IV, Attempt to Commit Murder in the First Degree: 4. Purposely; and 5. With premeditated malice; 6. Attempted to kill [the victim]. As to each of the counts, it is not necessary that the state prove every fact surrounding the allegation beyond a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Reilly v. State“there is obviously a substantial difference between a standard of 'less able' to safely drive a motor vehicle and 'incapable' of safely driving a motor vehicle.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Spreeman v. State“prohibiting driving while under the influence”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Spreeman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.