Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 766 So. 2d 1131 - Cabrera v. State

766 So. 2d 1131 - Cabrera v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 748 So. 2d 1028 - Stephens v. State · 629 So. 2d 90 - Munoz v. State · 453 So. 2d 1102 - Downs v. State · Sycamore v. Florida Atlantic University

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[D]efense counsel, by his substandard performance, deprived defendant of his sole defense and the opportunity to corroborate the defense”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. TAKENDRICK CAMPBELL v. STATE OF FLORIDA · 855 So. 2d 654 - Kenon v. State
  2. “The benchmark for judging claims of ineffectiveness . . . is whether the conduct of counsel 'so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. TAKENDRICK CAMPBELL v. STATE OF FLORIDA · 796 So. 2d 610 - Light v. State
  3. “There is a strong presumption of reasonableness that must be overcome, and strategic or tactical decisions by counsel made after a thorough investigation are `virtually unchallengeable.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 877 So. 2d 747 - State v. Chattin · 966 So. 2d 471 - State v. Patterson

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.