Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 766 SO2D 1234 - State v. Gandy

State v. Gandy’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Wardlow · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp. · Wright v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress comes to us clothed with a presumption of correctness, and we must interpret the evidence and reasonable inferences and deductions in a manner most favorable to sustaining that ruling. Johnson v. State, 608 So.2d 4, 9 (Fla.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 919 , 113 S.Ct. 2366 , 124 L.Ed.2d 273 (1993). In this case, the facts are undisputed and supported by competent substantial evidence. See Caso v. State, 524 So.2d 422 (Fla.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 870 , 109 S.Ct. 178 , 102 L.Ed.2d 147 (1988). Accordingly, our review of the trial court’s application of the law to the facts is de novo. See United States v. Harris, 928 F.2d 1113, 1115-16 (11th Cir.1991). In addition, we are constitutionally required to interpret search and seizure issues in conformity with the Fourth Amendment of the United States as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. See Fla. Const, art. I, § 12; Perez v. State, 620 So.2d 1256 (Fla.1993); Bernie v. State, 524 So.2d 988 (Fla.1988)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “some factual foundation in the circumstances observed by the officer, when the circumstances are interpreted in the light of the officer's knowledge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Whether an officer has a founded suspicion of criminal activity justifying a seizure is determined by the `totality of the circumstances.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.