Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 766 SO2D 1239 - Harris v. State

Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tart v. State · Wimberly v. State · Mingle v. State · 187 So. 2d 61 - Smith v. State · 524 So. 2d 1091 - Fassberg v. Albertson's, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We find that an appeal from a final order is the adequate and appropriate remedy for denial of a motion to dismiss in this context, just as it is in virtually every other setting.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.