Washington v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 293 So. 2d 44 - Lynch v. State · Melbourne v. State · 255 So. 2d 675 - Chesebrough v. State · 469 So. 2d 196 - Egal v. State · 111 So. 2d 51 - Buchanan v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“handled or fondled [the victims] in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“wicked, lustful, unchaste, licentious, or sensual”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.