766 So. 2d 550 - State v. Gray’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · 376 So. 2d 136 - State v. Reaves · 611 So. 2d 165 - State v. Leban · Bryant v. Sears Consumer Financial Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“ On June 7, 2004, Mr. Brown, who had been released on bond on April 7, 2004, appeared and was arraigned. A motion hearing was set for June 21, 2004, but it was continued upon motion of the defense to July 30, 2004. On July 30, 2004, the pretrial motion hearing was held and the trial court found probable cause to substantiate the charge and set trial for September 9, 2004, apparently without objection by the defense to the six-week delay. On September 9, 2004 and on October 7, 2004, the trial was continued upon joint motion of the State and the defense. The trial was rescheduled for December 17, 2004, again apparently with no objection by the defense to the two-month delay. On November 12, 2004, the trial court on its own motion rescheduled the trial from December 17th to December 20th because the court was going to be closed on December 17th. According to the November 12th minute entry, notice of the new trial date was to be sent to both the State and the defense. On December 20, 2004, when the parties appeared for trial, the State entered a nolle prosequi. On January 12, 2005, the State filed a new bill of information. Although arraignment was set for January 26, 2005, Mr. Brown did not appear. The trial court reset the arraignment for February 4, 2005, and directed that notice be sent to Mr. Brown by mail and that notice also be sent to the surety. When Mr. Brown did not appear on February 4, 2004, the trial court again directed that notice be sent by mail ”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The defense fails to argue that the State's motion for an appeal was untimely, and thus it will not be considered. Errors that are not briefed are considered abandoned.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.