Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 766 So. 2d 809 - Thomas v. State

766 So. 2d 809 - Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Murray v. Maggio · 684 So. 2d 608 - Conner v. State · Gilley v. State · 709 So. 2d 415 - Warren v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Mississippi Supreme Court has held that the failure to give an identification instruction, upon request, is reversible error where the identification of the accused rests entirely upon the testimony of a single witness. See Warren v. State, 709 So.2d 415, 420 (Miss. 1998).... Mrs. McQuillan's testimony was not the sole evidentiary basis upon which the identification of Thomas rested. Thomas's location near the crash sight of the stolen vehicle and his flight from law enforcement officers provided independent evidence of his involvement in the crimes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.