766 So. 2d 830 - Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 665 So. 2d 852 - Eakes v. State · Taylor v. State · 577 So. 2d 390 - Anderson v. State · Neal v. State · 728 So. 2d 565 - Kirksey v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Taylor alleged in his [PCR motion] that his attorney coerced him into accepting a plea bargain that was not in his best interest. But when asked by the court whether anyone, specifically [his attorney], had pressured him into pleading guilty, Taylor responded that he had not. Taylor’s allegations now directly contradict his own sworn statements at the plea hearing, documented in the transcript. We conclude!,] as did the trial judgef,] that Taylor was satisfied with his attorney’s performance and that no one coerced him into pleading guilty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.