Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 766 SW2D 580 - Ex Parte Aiken

Ex Parte Aiken’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 1994
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 296th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Renfro Drug Co. v. Lewis · Lassiter v. Bliss · Texas Department of Public Safety v. Wiggins · Smith v. Millsap

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Sec. 4. (a) If the state establishes that the petitioner is still subject to conviction for an offense arising out of the transaction for which he was arrested because the statute of limitations has not run and there is reasonable cause to believe that the state may proceed against him for the offense, the court may provide in its order that the law enforcement agency and the prosecuting attorney responsible for investigating the offense may retain any records and files that are necessary to the investigation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.