Chatman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
September 1998
most recently cited
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Richardson v. State · Thomas v. State · Wheatley v. State · Riley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A request for a hearing shall be made by motion on or before the date an amended motion is required to be filed.... If no request for hearing is timely filed ... a hearing shall not be held.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“One of the primary reasons for the adoption of the new rules is to provide an orderly and efficient procedure for handling postconviction relief motions which is consistent with due process. The new rules establish detailed procedures and impose time constraints. Rule 24.085(g) serves as notice to a movant that the court is going to rule on his motion for an evidentiary hearing unthin 15 days after a verified amended motion is required to be filed. This rule embodies the due process protections formerly provided Rule 27.26 movants by caselaw in decisions such as Wheatley_ (Emphasis in original).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Loewe v. State · Johnson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.