United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
767 F.2d 1259 · 1985
Citation profile
79 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 105 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably United States v. Griffin (1987), United States v. O'Connell (1988)
79 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Bruton v. United States · Berger v. United States · United States v. Tucker · California v. Trombetta
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 105 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although Luce was decided under Fed. R. Evid. 609(a)(1), its logic applies with equal force to motions under Rule 404.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'largely unlimited either as to the kind or information [it] may consider, or the source from which it may come.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he evidence presented at trial included photographs and diagrams of the sites of Triplett’s arrests, as well as witness testimony regarding the circumstances and conditions at those locations at the relevant times. Therefore, notwithstanding Triplett’s claim that a jury view of the arrest sites would have been critically helpful to the jury’s assessment of the police officers’ credibility, we hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Triplett’s jury view request.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.