Cranston v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
767 F.2d 1319 · 1985
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2007
9 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 30 U.S.C. § 184 · 30 U.S.C. § 226 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Swansboro Country, Inc. v. Lumberman's Mortgage Co. · Rice v. Norman Williams Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent an administrative agency's findings from being supported by substantial evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“searching and careful, subjecting the agency's decision to close judicial scrutiny.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.