Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 767 F.2d 1379 - Protectus Alpha Navigation Co. v. North Pacific Grain Growers, Inc.

Protectus Alpha Navigation Co. v. North Pacific Grain Growers, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

767 F.2d 1379 · 1985

Citation profile

94
cited by 94 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

39 federal appellate · 8 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 94 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2018 · most notably Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker (2008), Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker (2008)

39 federal appellate · 8 district · 9 state decisions

3701985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 2201 (Arson Prevention Act of 1994)

Relies on Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · Smith v. Wade · United States v. Reliable Transfer Co. · International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Foust · American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v. Hydrolevel Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “conduct which manifests 'reckless or callous disregard' for the rights of others, ... or 'gross negligence or actual malice criminal indifference.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “principles of comparative negligence are not applicable when damages can be apportioned to separate causes based on evidence in the record.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “conduct which manifests 'reckless or callous disregard' for the rights of others or for conduct which shows 'gross negligence or actual malice or criminal indifference.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.