Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 767 F.2d 1426 - Rev. Kinnith R. Nicholson v. Ruth L. Rushen

Rev. Kinnith R. Nicholson v. Ruth L. Rushen’s Empirical Analysis

767 F.2d 1426 · 1985

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
3
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably Brooktree Corporation v. Advanced Micro Devices Inc (1992), Hashimoto v. Dalton (1997)

35 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

3201985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lassiter v. Department of Social Services of Durham County North Carolina · Wolfolk v. Rivera · Mekdeci v. Merrell National Laboratories · Kushner v. Winterthur Swiss Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “has no right to effective assistance of counsel”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “there is generally no right to counsel in a civil case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.