King Memorial Hospital Inc Hialeah Hospital Inc v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services a P’s Empirical Analysis
767 F.2d 1508 · 1985
Citation profile
27 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently April 2012 · most notably Tringali v. Hathaway Machinery Co. (1986), Salem Mortgage Company Kelley v. Nodine B & B
27 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 158 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 300K
Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Catlin v. United States · Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Mestre · Dalton v. United States · Tidewater Group Inc Providers Benefit Life Insurance Company v. Tidewater Group Inc Tidewater Group Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he district court may withdraw ... any case or proceeding referred under this section, on its own motion or on timely motion of any party, for cause shown. The district court shall, on timely motion of a party, so withdraw a proceeding if the court determines that resolution of the proceeding requires consideration of both title 11 and other laws of the United States regulating organizations or activities affecting interstate commerce.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) finally determine claims collateral to and separable from the substance of other claims in the action; (2) cannot be reviewed along with the eventual final judgment because by then effective review will be precluded and rights conferred will be lost and (3) are too important to be denied review because they present a serious and unsettled question of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.