Wronke v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis
767 F.2d 354 · 1985
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 2001
13 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1631 · 5 U.S.C. § 705
Relies on Califano v. Sanders · Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Cherek v. United States · Megapulse, Inc. v. Lewis · Smith International, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ppellate jurisdiction [is]... based on the 'real rather than ostensible source of the district court's jurisdiction.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the Tucker Act was the source of [the district court's] authority to grant back pay. The suit was therefore 'based ... in part' on Sec. 1346, which places it within the exclusive appellate jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Chabal v. Reagan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.