Prohosky v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America’s Empirical Analysis
767 F.2d 387 · 1985
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2002
9 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc. · Dames & Moore v. Regan · Parks v. Pavkovic · Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation v. Psl Realty Co · Beneficial Finance Co. v. Wirtz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is limited to the determination of whether the district court abused its discretion in deciding that the circumstances of the case justified injunctive relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.